Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 288/2020

Case between V.V.Subrahmanyan et al vs V.V.Sadanandan et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-03-25
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, V.V.Subrahmanyan and V.V.Unni, filed a suit against the defendants, V.V.Sadanandan and V.V.Hariharan. The suit was dismissed due to both sides being absent and no representation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to both parties being absent and failing to take necessary steps in the proceedings.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V.V.Subrahmanyan (61 years years) Maniyanthara house, Ponnarimangalam desom, Ponnarimangalam village, Pin – 682 504 V.V.Unni (57 years years) Madathiparambu, Mandiram road, Ayyapankavu, Cross road No. 9, Ernakulam village

Defendants

V.V.Sadanandan (65 years years) residing at Velathuparambu, Ponnarimangalam desom, Mulavukad village, Mulavukad P.O, Pin – 682 504 V.V.Hariharan (63 years years) residing at Velathuparambil, Ponnarimangalam desom, Mulavukad village, Mulavukad P.O, Pin – 682 504

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed due to both sides being absent and no representation.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases