Case Summary
The plaintiffs, led by V.R.Sajeev Kumar, filed a suit against the defendants, including Manjusha.R. The court found that the plaintiffs were not interested in proceeding with the case, leading to its dismissal.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs showed no interest in continuing the matter.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not proceed with the case, indicating a lack of interest.
The plaintiffs did not proceed with the case, indicating a lack of interest.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not proceed with the case, indicating a lack of interest.
The plaintiffs did not proceed with the case, indicating a lack of interest.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the plaintiff Adv. Asiya.N submitted that the plaintiff is not proceeding the matter any further.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for want of prosecution. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.R.Sajeev Kumar
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Shailaja Mohan
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R.Ambika
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R.Radhika
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- R.Nirmala
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manjusha.R
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Lathika.R
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R.Vimala
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Raveendran Asari
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- H/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asha Rani.B.R
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Thonnakkal G.Rajeev
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Lekshmi Ramakrishnan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Jinu Jyothis
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Biju.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Parvathy.M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Aswani.P.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G.S. Sanal Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff is not proceeding with the matter.
Evidence:
the learned counsel for the plaintiff Adv. Asiya.N submitted that the plaintiff is not proceeding the matter any further.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2017