Case Summary
V.P. Vijayan is the complainant against Kamlesh for an offence under the Negotiable Instruments Act. The complainant was absent during the hearing, leading to the case being posted for evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The complainant was absent and did not provide any evidence. As a result, the accused was acquitted.
Key Reasoning:
The complainant's absence and lack of evidence led to the acquittal.
The complainant's absence and lack of evidence led to the acquittal.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The complainant has not adduced any evidence. Nor filed any proof affidavit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence accused acquitted U/s.256 Cr.PC
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.P. Vijayan
- Party Age
- 50
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kamlesh
- Party Age
- 26
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Complainant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. Binu N Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Adv. P.R. Pramod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused acquitted
Evidence:
Hence accused acquitted U/s.256 Cr.PC
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
ST
Case Code Year
2023
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act