Case Summary
The plaintiff, V.P. Rajamma, was repeatedly absent and did not show interest in proceeding with the suit. The defendant, Devassy alias Thomas, was present and represented during the hearing.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's repeated absence. The court deemed that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the suit.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.P. Rajamma
- Party Age
- 51
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Devassy alias Thomas
- Party Age
- 71
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S. Karthik Menon
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K. Dileepan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abraham.P.George
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.K. Robin Raj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Satisfied plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.P. Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding dismissal of suit for default
Case Code Year
Case between V.P. Rajamma vs Devassy alias Thomas regarding dismissal of suit for default