Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 692/2020

Case between V.M.H Ahamadullah vs ITC Limited, HDFC Bank Limited regarding suit not pressed

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

V.M.H Ahamadullah filed a suit against ITC Limited and HDFC Bank Limited. The plaintiff submitted that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed after the plaintiff's counsel stated it was not pressed, with no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed after the plaintiff's counsel stated it was not pressed, with no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as per the plaintiff's request.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed as per the plaintiff's request.
Supporting Evidence
The counsel for the plaintiff submits that the suit is not pressed. Memo is accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.M.H Ahamadullah
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ITC Limited
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
HDFC Bank Limited
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswin Gopakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amalnath Naik
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Niranjan Sudhir
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kandampully Vikram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.B. Unniraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anitha Puthussery
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amrutha Ramesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saraswathy P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The counsel for the plaintiff submits that the suit is not pressed. Filed a memo to that effect. Heard both sides. Memo is accepted. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.M.H Ahamadullah vs ITC Limited, HDFC Bank Limited regarding suit not pressed
Case Code Year
Case between V.M.H Ahamadullah vs ITC Limited, HDFC Bank Limited regarding suit not pressed

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won