Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 692/2020

Case between V.M.H Ahamadullah vs ITC Limited, HDFC Bank Limited regarding suit not pressed

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-11-08
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

V.M.H Ahamadullah filed a suit against ITC Limited and HDFC Bank Limited. The plaintiff submitted that the suit is not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed after the plaintiff's counsel stated it was not pressed, with no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed as per the plaintiff's request.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V.M.H Ahamadullah (55 years) 41/3479 A2, Vidyamketan Annex Building, Providence Road, Ernakulam - 682018

Defendants

ITC Limited (Age not specified years) Virginia House, 37, J.L. Nehru Road, Kolkata - 700071 HDFC Bank Limited (Age not specified years) Sudhas Building, Madhava Pharmacy Junction, Banerji Road, Ernakulam - 682018

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
The counsel for the plaintiff submits that the suit is not pressed. Filed a memo to that effect. Heard both sides. Memo is accepted. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases