Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1366/2016

Case between V.M.Chandrasekharan vs Sajan et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2024-10-01
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves V.M.Chandrasekharan as the plaintiff and Sajan and Kalamassery Municipality as the defendants. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not appear in court on the scheduled date.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff did not appear in court on the scheduled date.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants won because the plaintiff failed to appear in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendants won because the plaintiff failed to appear in court.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.M.Chandrasekharan
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajan
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kalamassery Municipality
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Emmanuel Tony P.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Premraj C.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Frijo K Sundaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil Kumar Kalleesseri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Hirushikesan S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vinod K.V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.K.Aboobacker
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to no representation from the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.M.Chandrasekharan vs Sajan et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between V.M.Chandrasekharan vs Sajan et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 10/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 10/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won