Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 932 /2021

Case between V.M. Mahadevan vs V.M. Murukesh Dev regarding a civil suit

Court
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a civil suit filed by V.M. Mahadevan against his son V.M. Murukesh Dev. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not interested in pursuing it further.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present and showed no interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present and showed no interest in pursuing the case. Consequently, the suit was dismissed for default.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff was not interested in pursuing the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff was not interested in pursuing the suit.
Supporting Evidence
The court is satisfied that plaintiff is not interested to pursue the suit further.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, Suit is dismissed for default. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V.M. Mahadevan
Party Age
73
Relation
S/o late V K Manikandachari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V.M. Murukesh Dev
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o V M Mahadevan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Afsal Mohammed
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Haritha Hariharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.Y. Saju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amritha.J.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
In the result, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.M. Mahadevan vs V.M. Murukesh Dev regarding a civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between V.M. Mahadevan vs V.M. Murukesh Dev regarding a civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won