Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 483/2025

Case between Vivek Bennet vs Laisa Krenzlin regarding injunction on property rights

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-12-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vivek Bennet, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction to prevent Laisa Krenzlin, the defendant, from encumbering property. The case involves disputes over wills and ownership rights to the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted an interim injunction against the defendant, prohibiting her from encumbering the property or creating documents related to it until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction against the defendant and her associates
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found a prima facie case in favor of the petitioner, noting the non-production of the contested Wills by the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

An order of interim injunction is passed, restraining respondent and her men from encumbering the plaint schedule property or creating any documents pertaining to plaint schedule property based on Will No.103/2018 of SRO, Edappally and Will No. 92 /2022 of SRO, Edappally, until further orders, from the date of this order.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vivek Bennet (36 years) Nilavareth House, APRA 2, Aryapadam Lane, LFC Road, Kaloor, Ernakulam, Pin 682 017

Defendants

Laisa Krenzlin (54 years) 41/842 (34/544) West Nook House, Edappally, Ernakulam, Pin 682 024

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining the respondent and her men from encumbering the plaint schedule property based on Will No. 103/2018 and Will No. 92/2022.
Evidence:
An order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondent and her men from encumbering the plaint schedule property or creating any documents pertaining to plaint schedule property based on Will No.103/2018 of SRO, Edappally and Will No. 92 /2022 of SRO, Edappally.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Will
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Will No. 130/2015 showing ownership of the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Order
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of the order in OP (Probate) 192/2023.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Will
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Copy of Will No. 92/2022 produced by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases