Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 341/2021

Case between Vithal Bose vs Manjusha M Panickar et al regarding civil suit

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-10-03
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vithal Bose filed a civil suit against Manjusha M Panickar and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed, with all interim orders vacated.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff, with the court vacating all interim orders.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiff, with the court vacating all interim orders.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Not available

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed as not pressed. All interim orders shall stand vacated.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vithal Bose
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manjusha M Panickar
Party Age
28
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyamala M Panickar
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K C Balakrishnan
Party Age
74
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Vinod Vallikkappan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M V S Nampoothiri
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Archana Divakaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shinto Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Martin Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Eldho Cherian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V A Johnson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Cyriac Tom
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Naveen K Varkey
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that matter become infractous and hence not pressing the matter.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vithal Bose vs Manjusha M Panickar et al regarding civil suit
Case Code Year
Case between Vithal Bose vs Manjusha M Panickar et al regarding civil suit

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won