Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 188/2025

Case between Viswakarma Service Soceity, Branch No. 30 vs Viswakarma Service Society, Kottayam District Committee et al regarding Compromise Agreement.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Indu. P. Raj
Order Date
2025-08-21
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves a suit filed by Viswakarma Service Society against the Kottayam District Committee and another. The court has recorded a compromise agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed based on the compromise agreement between the parties.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Compromise Agreement shall form part of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed based on the compromise agreement between the parties.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court accepted the terms of the compromise as lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court accepted the terms of the compromise as lawful.
Supporting Evidence
Terms lawful accepted.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement. Compromise Agreement shall form part of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Viswakarma Service Soceity, Branch No. 30
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viswakarma Service Society, Kottayam District Committee
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Viswakarma Service Society, P K Kumaranachary Smaraka Mandiram
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Compromise Agreement
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sunish G Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P K Vinod Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of Compromise Agreement.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Compromise agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court allowed the Compromise Agreement which was filed by both sides and decreed the suit in terms of this agreement.
Reference:
IA 4/25

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Viswakarma Service Soceity, Branch No. 30 vs Viswakarma Service Society, Kottayam District Committee et al regarding Compromise Agreement.
Case Code Year
Case between Viswakarma Service Soceity, Branch No. 30 vs Viswakarma Service Society, Kottayam District Committee et al regarding Compromise Agreement.

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Tue, 09/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Elizabeth Mani et al vs M/s. Coromandel International Ltd., EID – Parry (India) Ltd. regarding property possession
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self-Employers Service Society vs Bindhu Sanil et al regarding Suit dismissal
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Rajesh V. regarding dismissal of suit
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kumari Anuranjana Anil vs Deputy Director of Education et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Abraham Philipose et al vs John Mathyas et al regarding injunction and fixation of boundary
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won