Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 268/2020

Case between Viswakala vs Susan Abraham et al regarding defamation.

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A.
Order Date
2025-12-20
Duration
approximately-5 years 7 months
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Viswakala, a beautician and former joint secretary of All Kerala Beauticians Association, filed a suit against Susan Abraham and others for defamation. The defendants allegedly made defamatory statements about her conduct during an association class, damaging her reputation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for defamation was dismissed by the court. The judge noted there was no substantive evidence provided by the plaintiff to support her claims.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for defamation was dismissed by the court. The judge noted there was no substantive evidence provided by the plaintiff to support her claims.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to produce adequate evidence to support her claims of defamation.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not produce mobile phone to prove the defamation through the WhatsApp group. And did not produce printout of any message before the court as per law.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, The suit is dismissed. On considering the facts and circumstances of the case, there is no order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Viswakala
Party Age
56
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Susan Abraham
Relation
President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saritha Prasad
Relation
Treasurer
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Reena Sumo
Relation
Vice President
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Maya
Relation
Executive Committee Member
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sherly Philipose
Relation
Secretary
Plaintiffs Documents
Office copy of Advocate notice, Postal receipts, Postal acknowledgment cards.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B. Syamaprasad
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
John George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought damages for defamation by defendants.
Evidence:
The suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Produced as evidence for legal notices issued to defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to confirm receipt of legal notices by defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Photograph
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Marked subject to proof regarding the alleged defamatory behavior.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defendants admitted statements in reply but justified them.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Defamation
Case Code
Case between Viswakala vs Susan Abraham et al regarding defamation.
Case Code Year
Case between Viswakala vs Susan Abraham et al regarding defamation.

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 12/01/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 12/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Association

Similar Cases

Case between Anto.D, Boniface Netto@Bony Victor, Sabu Joy, Dixon, Zico Michael, Jose John vs Rev. Fr. Anil Jose, Samson G Netto regarding damages for defamation.
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between O A Puraharan vs Sree Shanmughavilasam Sabha et al regarding temporary injunction
IN THE COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Shop & Office Holders Association, Ernakulam Marine Drive Commercial Complex (SOHA) vs Greater Cochin Development Authority (GCDA) regarding declaration and injunction.
II Additional Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Pachalam Vyapari Vyavasayikalude Paraspara Sahaya Dhana Fund et al vs K.K. Viswambaran et al regarding transfer to another court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between K H Ikbal et al vs All Kerala Sawmill and Wood Industries Owners Association et al regarding dismissal of suit for default
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Defendant Won