Case Summary
This case involves plaintiffs Vishnu.S. and Anisha against defendants Maya.G and Morarji Kumar regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
As the plaintiff absent and not ready for evidence, suit dismissed for default with costs of the defendants.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vishnu.S.
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Anisha
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maya.G
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Morarji Kumar
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Santhosh Kumar.R.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V.Hariprasad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- I.Stevenson
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
suit dismissed for default with costs of the defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vishnu.S. vs Maya.G regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vishnu.S. vs Maya.G regarding Injunction