Case Summary
The plaintiff, Vishnu Sadan.S, filed a suit for injunction. The plaintiff was continuously absent from the proceedings.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not represented and continuously absent.
The plaintiff was not represented and continuously absent.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not represented and continuously absent.
The plaintiff was not represented and continuously absent.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not represented and called absent. Plaintiff is continuously absent and no representation as well.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vishnu Sadan.S
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- N.Chandrikadevi
- Party Age
- 80
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vishnu Sreenivasan @ Vishnu Sreenivasan Pillai
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Usha Sreenivasan
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.Harikumar (Plavilayil)
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Anzari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for want of prosecution due to plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for want of prosecution.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vishnu Sadan.S vs N.Chandrikadevi et al regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vishnu Sadan.S vs N.Chandrikadevi et al regarding Injunction