Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 189/2024

Case between Vishnu Reddy vs Lissy regarding temporary injunction on property

Court
I Additional Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-01-10
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vishnu Reddy, the plaintiff, claims ownership of a pathway which the defendant, Lissy, is allegedly encroaching upon by constructing a gate. The plaintiff seeks a temporary injunction to prevent the defendant from further construction and interference with his property rights.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the plaintiff's application for a temporary injunction against the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for the injunction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vishnu Reddy (30 years years) Sanskriti Garden, 71/1530-C, Earth, Elamakkara kara, Edappally south village, Kanayannur taluk, Elamakkara P.O, Pin – 682 026

Defendants

Lissy (50 years years) Velikkakath, Delstar road, Vytilla desom, Poonithura village, Vytila P.O, Pin – 682 019

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a temporary injunction restraining the defendant from illegal constructions and trespassing.
Evidence:
Thus, for the said reasons the petition is only liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishes the plaintiff's claimed ownership and rights over the B-scheduled property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishes the plaintiff's claimed ownership and rights over the B-scheduled property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document serves as evidence of the plaintiff's financial responsibilities related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document indicates prior attempts to address the issue with authorities regarding the encroachment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document supports the defendant's claim of rightful ownership and historical usage of the B-scheduled pathway.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Gift Deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document supports the defendant's ownership chain and right to use the B-scheduled pathway.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document supports the defendant's ownership and usage rights over the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document indicates the defendant's financial responsibilities related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Document provides an objective assessment related to the ongoing dispute over the B-scheduled pathway.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases