Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 723/2016

Case between Virat Viswabrahma Samajam vs Shri. K.G Sundaran et al regarding declaration and injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-10-24
Duration
approximately-8 years 10 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Virat Viswabrahma Samajam and its President, claim that the defendants are illegally using their organization's name and have formed a rival organization. They seek a declaration that their association is duly registered and an injunction to stop the defendants from using their name.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiffs could not establish that the first plaintiff is a running association duly registered, since its registration had been struck off. The defendants are allowed to continue using the name of their registered association.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The first plaintiff association's registration was found to be stricken off and they could not prove the existence of their association in law.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is dismissed. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs to the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Virat Viswabrahma Samajam (Age not specified years) Tharamekkavu Bhagavathi Kshethram, Thekkumbhagam, Tripunithura Shri. M. G Murukesan (52 years) Maliekkal Puthenveedu, Udayamperoor, Manakunnam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District

Defendants

Shri. K.G Sundaran (38 years) Kurunnoth House, Chathari, Tripunithura, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Shri. P. G Murugan (62 years) Plappillil House, Eroor South P.O, Nadama Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District Shri. K.N Jayakumar (38 years) Kunnumpurath House, Alppara, Kannara P.O, Thrissur District Virat Viswabrahma Samajam (Age not specified years) Tripunithura

Reliefs

Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a declaration that the association is a running organization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff's registration has been struck off citing the reason defunct by gazette notification.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaintiff sought a decree to prevent defendants from using the name of the first plaintiff association.
Evidence:
Fourth defendant is duly registered under the provisions of the Act, and thus cannot be restrained from using the name.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: By law of Virat Viswabrahma Samajam
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the regulatory framework under which the first plaintiff association operates.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Trust Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is essential for establishing the ownership of the properties by the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirms the purchase of property that belongs to the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is another evidence of property ownership by the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document further establishes the first plaintiff's ownership of property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document may reflect agreements pertaining to the first plaintiff's operations.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof that the first plaintiff is remitting tax for its owned properties.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Certified copy of the Judgment in O.S 776/2015
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This judgment is relevant to the ongoing disputes concerning the first plaintiff's legal standing.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Representation submitted to the District Registrar
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is pivotal for the plaintiff's claim regarding the registration status.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Letter issued by District Registrar
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter addresses the status of the registration related to the first plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Statement submitted by K.R Janakarajan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement serves as evidence from the secretary of the plaintiff association.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Letter submitted to District Registrar
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This letter holds importance in relation to the claims made against the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Statement submitted by K.R Janakarajan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement is additional support for the claims made by the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Certified copy of Judgment in WP(c) No.9260/2015
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This judgment underscores discussions relevant to the plaintiff's claims against the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases