Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 249/2021

Case between Vipin Raj vs Sreekumari Sreekumar et al regarding non prosecution of the suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-08-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Vipin Raj, was absent for several court postings, including the day of the hearing. The court dismissed the case for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's lack of interest in proceeding.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found the plaintiff continuously absent and determined that the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding with the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to appear and represent his case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff not interested to proceed further. Hence suit dismissed for non prosecution.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vipin Raj (36 years years) Mankayil House, Thaikkattukara P.O Ambatukavu, Alwaye-638106

Defendants

Sreekumari Sreekumar (51 years years) Sreenilayam, MNRA 64 Kollamuri Road, Edappally Toll Kochi-682014 Anish.S. (34 years years) Devi Bhavan, Mulakkalathukavu Thattatumala, Kilimanoor Trivandrum-695614

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for non prosecution due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of the view that plaintiff not interested to proceed further. Hence suit dismissed for non prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2021 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases