Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1138 /2023

Case between Vinu et al vs Biju P.T. et al regarding realization of money and permanent prohibitory injunction.

Court
II ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2024-09-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Vinu and Rima Ann, filed a suit for realization of money and for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The court found that the plaintiffs were absent and did not remit the required court fee.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaint for non-payment of balance court fee due to the absence of the plaintiffs and no representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vinu (47 years) Nalathara House, Paripu P.O., Kottayam, Pin:686014 Rima Ann (39 years) Nalathara House, Paripu P.O., Kottayam, Pin:686014 Roy P. George (52 years) P.N.R.A – 24, Mukalel House, Panorama Nagar, Maradu, Cochin, Pin:682304

Defendants

Biju P.T. (48 years) Pulickapparambil House, Olanadu P.O. Varappuzha Now residing at Pioneer Towers, 9th Floor, Room No. 904, Marine Drive, Cochin-682011 Sreeja M.V (34 years) Palavaunkal House, Udayathinvathil, Panangadu, Now residing at Pioneer Towers, 9th Floor, Room No. 904, Marine Drive, Cochin, Pin:682011

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Suit is one for realization of money and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Suit is one for realization of money and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence plaint is rejected for non payment of balance court fee under Order VII Rule 11 of CPC.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases