Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1172/2024

Case between Vinod U et al vs Johnson M M et al regarding temporary injunction.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K. Dinamany.
Order Date
2024-11-13
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vinod U and Suresh U filed a petition for a temporary injunction against Johnson M M, Jolly Titus, and Laly Victor. The plaintiffs seek protection from eviction and damage to their shop room.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiffs. The defendants are restrained from evicting the plaintiffs and causing damage to their business.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining the respondents from evicting the petitioners from the shop.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the plaintiffs. The defendants are restrained from evicting the plaintiffs and causing damage to their business.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioners made out a prima facie case for the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioners have made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioners.

Judgment Evidence:

An order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from evicting petitioners from the plain schedule shop room by force.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinod U
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Suresh U
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Johnson M M
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jolly Titus
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laly Victor
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kavya R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smitha R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ramesh N
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Order of interim injunction restraining the respondents from evicting petitioners from the plain schedule shop room by force.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from evicting petitioners from the plain schedule shop room by force.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vinod U et al vs Johnson M M et al regarding temporary injunction.
Case Code Year
Case between Vinod U et al vs Johnson M M et al regarding temporary injunction.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 11/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sat, 11/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won