E.P No. 254/2025

Case between Vineeth Mathew et al vs Jayasankar P.R. et al regarding decree enforcement

Court

COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2025-12-08

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Vineeth Mathew and Serina Elizabeth Jacob as decree holders against Jayasankar P.R. and Aparna Jayasankar as judgment debtors regarding the enforcement of a decree. The trial court order was set aside by the High Court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The court set aside the trial court's order, concluding the case.

Why Plaintiff Won:
The High Court's order set aside the trial court decision.

Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The High Court's order set aside the trial court decision.

Supporting Evidence

The High Court's order was decisive in favor of the decree holders.

Judgment Evidence:

Trial court order set aside by Honorable High court in OPRC 228/25 dated 25.11.2025. Hence closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Vineeth Mathew
Party Age: 49
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Serina Elizabeth Jacob
Party Age: 45
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Rachel Raju
Party Age: 76
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Jayasankar P.R.
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Aparna Jayasankar
Party Age: 41
Relation: W/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Basil Mathew
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Ninan John
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sanjana Sara Varghese
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Arya A.R.
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P.S. Anishad
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification