Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1195/2025

Case between Vimala Valsan vs Mini Joseph regarding interim injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-11-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vimala Valsan filed a petition seeking an interim injunction against Mini Joseph to prevent encroachment on a property. The court found that Vimala made out a prima facie case for the injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court issued an interim injunction restraining Mini Joseph from encroaching upon the property belonging to Vimala Valsan until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction issued
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court issued an interim injunction restraining Mini Joseph from encroaching upon the property belonging to Vimala Valsan until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondent her men from encroaching into or inducting third parties into the plaint schedule property or alienating the same or constructing anything or committing any waste, mischief or any act detrimental to the title ownership and possession of the plaintiff in the plaint schedule property until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vimala Valsan
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mini Joseph
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Revathy P Manoharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T M Fathima
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining the respondent from encroaching into or inducting third parties into the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondent her men from encroaching into or inducting third parties into the plaint schedule property or alienating the same or constructing anything or committing any waste, mischief or any act detrimental to the title ownership and possession of the plaintiff in the plaint schedule property until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vimala Valsan vs Mini Joseph regarding interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Vimala Valsan vs Mini Joseph regarding interim injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won