Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.994/2024

Case between Vilasini et al vs Jayakumari et al regarding default dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Judge
Smt.Salini.B.
Order Date
2025-01-07
Duration
Case Code No.
994
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Vilasini and Umadevi, filed a suit against multiple defendants including Jayakumari and Sulaiman. The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiffs did not cure the defects in their steps.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiffs failed to cure the defects. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default as the plaintiffs failed to cure the defects. The judgment was pronounced in open court.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs did not address the defects in their filing.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiffs did not address the defects in their filing.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiffs failed to cure the defect in steps.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vilasini
Party Age
83
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Umadevi
Party Age
73
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayakumari
Party Age
52
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sulaiman
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
District Collector
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tahsildar
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Village Officer
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Deepu.U.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Arunjith.A.L
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Fathima.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2024

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
70%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won