Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
EP 218/2016

Case between Vijayan vs Parameswaran regarding Execution Petition

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-10-04
Duration
0 years, 11 months, 15 days
Case Code No.
218
Case Closed
Wed, 10/04/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijayan, the Managing Director of Kunnamkulam Finance Compaly Ltd., filed an Execution Petition against Parameswaran for non-payment, resulting in the EP being closed by court order.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court closed the Execution Petition as no deposit seen and an EP for attachment and sale was preferred against the respondents.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Closing of the Execution Petition
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court closed the Execution Petition as no deposit seen and an EP for attachment and sale was preferred against the respondents.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned.
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

No batta seen deposited. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that EP may be closed. The endorsement was also effected by stating that an EP for attachment and sale was preferred against the respondents. Hence EP is closed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayan
Party Age
59
Relation
Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parameswaran
Party Age
37
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
I.V.Rathish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate appearing for Parameswaran
Appearance Type
Unknown

Reliefs

Relief Type: Closing of Execution Petition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Closing the Execution Petition against Parameswaran
Evidence:
No batta seen deposited. The counsel for the petitioner submitted that EP may be closed. The endorsement was also effected by stating that an EP for attachment and sale was preferred against the respondents. Hence EP is closed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Enforcement of Court Orders
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
EP
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Thu, 10/20/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 10/04/2017 - 12:00
From
Sun, 10/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Tue, 10/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs Raghunandanan. M.V. et al regarding decree transmission
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Unknown
Case between The Secretary vs Ammiyangara Viswanathan regarding debt satisfaction
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenivasan vs Ashraf regarding execution of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between The Secretary vs Chamaparambil Kari et al regarding enforcement of decree
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Execution Petition Dismissed
Case between Secretary, Thennala Service Co-op.Bank Ltd. vs Surendran et al regarding debt repayment
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Execution Petition Plaintiff Won