Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
OS.340/2024

Case between Vijayamma vs Saith regarding temporary injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Alshari A.
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Vijayamma, seeks a temporary injunction against the respondent, Saith, to stop him from excavating soil that is affecting her property’s lateral support. The petitioner claims to have enjoyed the lateral support for over 50 years, while the respondent denies this and asserts the legitimacy of his construction activities.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The petition for temporary injunction is allowed. The respondent is restrained from excavating soil within 5 meters from the boundary that affects the lateral support of the petitioner’s property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction against excavation
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favored her.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed as follows: The respondent or his men are restrained from excavating soil to a distance of 5 meters from the boundary of plaint A schedule property in the plaint B schedule property by losing the lateral support to plaint A schedule property, by way of temporary injunction.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vijayamma (67 years years) Vazhappillil House, Kaithakkadu Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Defendants

Saith (50 years years) Thandakkala House, Kaithakkadu Kara, Pattimattom Village, Kunnathunadu Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Temporary injunction restraining the respondent from excavating soil to a distance of 5 meters from the boundary of plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
In view of the above discussions, I find that, the petitioner is entitled for the relief of temporary injunction as prayed for.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The property was assigned in favor of the petitioner by virtue of this document.
Reference:
No. 3018/89
Document Type: Title deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The property originally belonged to the father of the petitioner as per this document.
Reference:
No. 2341/1970
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The commission report noted the excavation of soil and destruction of boundaries.
Reference:
null
Document Type: Affidavit
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The statements in the affidavit supported the petitioner's case.
Reference:
null

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases