Case Summary
The plaintiff, Vijayalaskhmi, has filed a suit for the realization of money against M/s Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd and others. The 4th defendant filed a petition seeking to reject the plaint on the grounds that the matter should be referred to arbitration due to a lease agreement clause.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the plaintiff's suit was maintainable as it was filed for recovery of dues, which the defendants had failed to prove were barred by law.
The court determined that the plaintiff's suit was maintainable as it was filed for recovery of dues, which the defendants had failed to prove were barred by law.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, Petition is dismissed. Considering the facts and circumstance of the case, parties are directed to bear their respective costs.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Vijayalaskhmi (Age not specified years)
Poovathuparambil House, Eloor East, Udyogmandel P O, Eloor Village, Paravur Taluk, Ernakulam- 683501
Defendants
M/s Chennai Network Infrastructure Ltd (Age not specified years)
Circle office at GTL Infrastructure Ltd., Door No. 40/9643, Prabhu Tower, First Floor, Opposite Chennai Silks, M G Road, Cochin- 35
GTL Infrastructure Ltd. (Age not specified years)
2ⁿᵈ Floor, Prabhu Tower, Veekshanam Road, Ernakulam- 35
1st defendant (Age not specified years)
2ⁿᵈ defendant (Age not specified years)
3ʳᵈ defendant (Age not specified years)
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
The petition filed by the 4th defendant seeking to reject the plaint.
Evidence:
In the result, Petition is dismissed.