Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 258/2018

Case between Vijayalakshmi vs Anilkumar et al regarding non-prosecution of the suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2026-01-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vijayalakshmi has filed a suit against Anilkumar and Shaji. The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in proceeding further.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiff did not show interest in proceeding with the case and dismissed it for non-prosecution.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiff did not show interest in proceeding with the case and dismissed it for non-prosecution.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file any application or proof affidavit to proceed.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not file any application or proof affidavit to proceed.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff remained absent, name called, no representation. No proof affidavit seen filed so far.

Judgment Evidence:

This court is view that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with this case. Thus the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayalakshmi
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anilkumar
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shaji
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rosy P.F.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
C. Devanand
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mudhusoodhanan S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.D. Suni
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jinoy Thankachan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aparna P. Menon
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Evidence:
this court is view that plaintiff is not interested to proceed further with this case.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayalakshmi vs Anilkumar et al regarding non-prosecution of the suit
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayalakshmi vs Anilkumar et al regarding non-prosecution of the suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 01/01/2026 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/21/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won