Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.596/2004

Case between Vijayakumaran Nair vs Sreekumaran Nair regarding setting aside the commission report and plan

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-III
Judge
Smt Sreelakshmi C.
Order Date
2025-06-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Vijayakumaran Nair as the plaintiff and Sreekumaran Nair as the defendant, focusing on the petition filed to set aside a commission report related to property measurements and boundary definitions. The plaintiff contends that the original commission report was accurate while the defendant argues it was flawed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the application filed by the defendant to set aside the commission report, stating that the report was prepared based on accurate surveys and records.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the application filed by the defendant to set aside the commission report, stating that the report was prepared based on accurate surveys and records.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the commission report to be accurate and well-founded based on evidence presented.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found the commission report to be accurate and well-founded based on evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
After having considered the evidence before this court I do not find any material error in the commission report or that the report and truth are poles apart.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, this application is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijayakumaran Nair
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreekumaran Nair
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Dharmapalan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. S. Rengananthan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. M. Sasilekha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Application to set aside the commission report and plan.
Evidence:
For the aforesaid reasons I do not find any ground to set aside the commission report. Hence this application stands dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Commission report and plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court used this document to assess the application to set aside the commission report and evaluate the claims presented by both parties.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vijayakumaran Nair vs Sreekumaran Nair regarding setting aside the commission report and plan
Case Code Year
Case between Vijayakumaran Nair vs Sreekumaran Nair regarding setting aside the commission report and plan

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won