Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.1271/2020

Case between Vijaya vs Rugmini regarding suit dismissal for default.

Court
II Additional Munsiff
Judge
Smt. Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-03-13
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Vijaya and Geetha, filed a suit against the defendants, Rugmini and Sugathan. The plaintiffs were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs, who had no representation in court.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiffs' absence resulted in the dismissal of their suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default. Pronounced by me, in the Open court on this the 13th day of March, 2024.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vijaya (58 years years) Meppadath House, Muttinakam.P.O., Varapuzha, Ernakulam District, Pin – 683 517 Geetha (54 years years) Pallathparamb house, Vallikkadavu, Koonammavu.P.O., Ernakulam District, Pin – 683 518

Defendants

Rugmini (88 years years) Pulithara Nikathil, Ponnarimangalam, Mulavukadu.P.O., Ernakukam District, Pin – 682 504 Sugathan (62 years years) Pulithara Nikathil, Ponnarimangalam, Mulavukadu.P.O., Ernakukam District, Pin – 682 504

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to plaintiff absence.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases