Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 229/2025

Case between Vijai Pharma vs Jan Aushadhi Medical regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-10-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Vijai Pharma, has filed a suit against the defendant, Jan Aushadhi Medical, for the recovery of an outstanding amount of Rs.4,67,791/- due to non-payment for products purchased on credit. The suit was uncontested as the defendant failed to appear in court.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.4,67,791/- along with interest and costs. The judgment was based on the evidentiary documents provided by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,67,791/- from the defendants along with interest and costs.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay Rs.4,67,791/- along with interest and costs. The judgment was based on the evidentiary documents provided by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff and the evidence supported the plaintiff's claim for the outstanding payment.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unrebutted oral testimony of the plaintiff and the evidence supported the plaintiff's claim for the outstanding payment.
Supporting Evidence
The unrebutted oral testimony of PW1 and Exts.A1 series to A4 established the case as pleaded by the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows; The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,67,791- (Rupees Four Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety One only) from the defendants and from their assets.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vijai Pharma
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jan Aushadhi Medical
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Printout of bills 14.08.2018 to 16.01.2019, Copy of Lawyer's notice dated 24.01.2025
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sebin Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Liya Laurence
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,67,791 from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.4,67,791- (Rupees Four Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety One only) from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.4,67,791 from the date of suit till date decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 12% per annum for Rs.4,67,791- (Rupees Four Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety One only) from the date of suit till date decree from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,67,791 from date of decree till date of realization.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize interest @ 6% per annum for Rs.4,67,791- (Rupees Four Lakh Sixty Seven Thousand Seven Hundred and Ninety One only) from date of decree till date of realization from the defendants and from their assets.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realize costs of the suit from defendants and from their assets.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Printout of bills
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The bills reflect transactions where the defendant failed to make payments.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Certification of Ext. A1 Series
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certifies the authenticity of the bills presented.
Reference:
Ext.A1(a)
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer's notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notifies the defendant of the outstanding balance due.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Copy of postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the lawyer's notice to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Original of Ext A3
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original evidence of the postal receipt was presented.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Copy of acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as proof of the defendant receiving the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Original of Ext. A4
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original evidence of acknowledgment of receipt by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Copy of Bank statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Attempted to show the financial transactions, but rejected.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Vijai Pharma vs Jan Aushadhi Medical regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Vijai Pharma vs Jan Aushadhi Medical regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 10/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won