Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 810/2021

Case between Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited vs Insight Meida City (India) Pvt Ltd. regarding joint compromise petition.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-12-19
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited filed a suit against Insight Media City (India) Pvt Ltd. regarding a joint compromise petition. The court delivered a judgment allowing the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in terms of the joint compromise petition, allowing the relief requested by the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in terms of the joint compromise petition, allowing the relief requested by the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The judgment was based on the joint compromise petition agreed upon by both parties.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The judgment was based on the joint compromise petition agreed upon by both parties.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise petition. IA 31/25 and the order therein shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited
Relation
represented by its Authorised Signatory
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Insight Meida City (India) Pvt Ltd.
Relation
represented by its Managing Director
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Managing Director, Insight Media City (India) Pvt Ltd.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Navod Prasannan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.V.Krishnakumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Santheep Ankarath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rahul Kandampully
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise petition.
Evidence:
Suit is decreed in terms of the joint compromise petition.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited vs Insight Meida City (India) Pvt Ltd. regarding joint compromise petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Vihaan Direct Selling (India) Private Limited vs Insight Meida City (India) Pvt Ltd. regarding joint compromise petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 12/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won