Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 470/2002

Case between Vidya Kalesan et al vs Vidyadharan Vamanan et al regarding execution of decree

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-23
Duration
approximately-13 years 1 month

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The decree holders, successors of the plaintiffs, are seeking to execute a decree that restrains the judgment debtors from entering the plaint schedule property. The judgment debtors have allegedly trespassed the property, violating the decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed as it was found to be barred by limitation. The court stated that there was no averment of the mandatory injunction part of the decree being executed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The execution petition was found hopelessly barred by limitation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, EP stands dismissed. No order as to costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vidya Kalesan (72 years years) Amritheswari Nilayam, Civil View Street, Civil Station, Kozhikode 673 020 Devidas Vamanan (67 years years) Saidev, Malakkal Paramba, East Hill, Kozhikode 673 005

Defendants

Vidyadharan Vamanan (65 years years) Aarvee Nivas, Basin Road, Kochi – 682 031 Padma Vidyadharan (59 years years) Aarvee Nivas, Basin Road, Kochi – 682 031

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The execution petition sought to enforce a permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
the execution petition is not maintainable and is dismissed
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
The petition requested the sending of the first judgment debtor to civil prison and attachment of properties.
Evidence:
the execution petition is not maintainable and is dismissed

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Registered Will
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is referred to as the basis for the decree holders' claim to the property.
Reference:
document No. 68 /2022
Document Type: Letter of Administration
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was issued with respect to the registered will.
Reference:
Document Type: Assignment Document
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is referenced to show the assignment of property to the second decree holder.
Reference:
document No.3391 by 1997
Document Type: Decree
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This decree is the basis for the execution petition and outlines the injunctions against the judgment debtors.
Reference:
OS 470/2002
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This judgment is mentioned to illustrate the procedural history of the case.
Reference:
Judgment and Decree in OS 6/2016

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 02/15/2002 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases