Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1005/2023

Case between Vidhyarthayini Sabha et al vs Snehaja et al regarding recovery of money

Court
THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Padmakumar.G.
Order Date
2024-04-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves Vidhyarthayini Sabha against several defendants regarding the recovery of an amount due under a chitty agreement. The plaintiff claims that the defendants defaulted on their payments despite repeated demands.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay a total amount of Rs.8,27,700/- along with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover this amount from the defendants and their assets if defaulted.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amount of Rs.8,27,700/- with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed directing the defendants to pay a total amount of Rs.8,27,700/- along with interest. The plaintiff is entitled to recover this amount from the defendants and their assets if defaulted.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged proof affidavit and documents would satisfactorily prove the plaint claim.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.8,27,700/- (Rupees Eight lakhs twenty seven thousand and seven hundred only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit (ie, from 19.10.2023) till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vidhyarthayini Sabha
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vinayakumar
Party Age
39
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Radhkrishnan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Dinamani
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Snehaja
Party Age
53
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suganthi
Party Age
59
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sukesh
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Pavana
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhishan
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Original Chitty agreement dated 08.06.2010, Original Sale deed no. 3564/1996, Confirmation letter signed by defendant, True copy of lawyer notice dated 22.06.2023.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.V.Jessy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amala Purushothaman
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The court ordered the defendants to pay an amount of Rs.8,27,700/- with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed directing the defendants jointly and severally to pay an amount of Rs.8,27,700/-/- (Rupees Eight lakhs twenty seven thousand and seven hundred only) with 6% interest per annum from the date of suit( ie, from 19.10.2023) till the date of decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Chitty Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Chitty agreement related to the chit transactions.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original Sale deed no. 3564/1996 of SRO Ernakulam.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Confirmation letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Original of the confirmation letter signed by defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
True copy of lawyer notice issued to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned cover of A/D cover of 1st defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned cover with A/D card of Nandini with endorsement as address expired.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Returned Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned cover with A/D card of 2nd and 4th defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Acknowledgment Cards
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment cards (4nos) related to the correspondence.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Vidhyarthayini Sabha et al vs Snehaja et al regarding recovery of money
Case Code Year
Case between Vidhyarthayini Sabha et al vs Snehaja et al regarding recovery of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 04/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 04/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Thoppil Fincorp et al vs Navas A.A et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nikhil.N. Asher vs Plymart et al regarding suit for realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Space International Air Travels (P) Ltd. vs Tapovan Impex Private Limited regarding recovery of money
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Ambatt Electricals regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Transformers and Electrical Industries vs M/s. Kureekode Agencies regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won