Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1100/2024

Case between Victor Joseph vs Roshini Telfin et al regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-05-27
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Victor Joseph filed a suit against Roshini Telfin and Telfin. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was specifically requested to appear but failed to do so.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff. The plaintiff was specifically requested to appear but failed to do so.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented in court.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was continuously absent and not represented in court.
Supporting Evidence
The suit was specifically posted to this date for the plaintiff to appear and submit whether he is intending to proceed with the suit. Still, the plaintiff is absent and not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Victor Joseph
Party Age
42
Relation
S/o K.K.Joseph
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roshini Telfin
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o Telfin
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Telfin
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o Jose
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sheeba Mariam J
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Arundathy K Alias
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Anupama K Alias
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Athul Tom
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Denny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Victor Joseph vs Roshini Telfin et al regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Victor Joseph vs Roshini Telfin et al regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won