Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 421/2022

Case between Vibin Das vs Salim, C.G. Joseph, Rosy et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Vibin Das as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Salim and C.G. Joseph. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not ready to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of readiness to present evidence and no steps taken to adduce evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of readiness to present evidence and no steps taken to adduce evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present evidence and provide any reasonable justification for delays.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to present evidence and provide any reasonable justification for delays.
Supporting Evidence
The court found that the plaintiff was not ready for evidence and did not provide tenable reasons for adjournment.

Judgment Evidence:

As plaintiff is not ready for evidence in listed case and as no steps are taken to adduce evidence in listed case, dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vibin Das
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Salim
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
C.G. Joseph
Party Age
77
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rosy
Party Age
73
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rego
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Farun Sathar P.S
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P. M Ziraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Kabil Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anilkumar P. V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Saritha D
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Manu Murali. T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mino Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff sought an adjournment without any tenable reason.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is not ready for evidence in listed case and as no steps are taken to adduce evidence in listed case, dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vibin Das vs Salim, C.G. Joseph, Rosy et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Vibin Das vs Salim, C.G. Joseph, Rosy et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won