Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 421/2022

Case between Vibin Das vs Salim, C.G. Joseph, Rosy et al regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Vibin Das as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Salim and C.G. Joseph. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not ready to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's lack of readiness to present evidence and no steps taken to adduce evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to present evidence and provide any reasonable justification for delays.

Judgment Evidence:

As plaintiff is not ready for evidence in listed case and as no steps are taken to adduce evidence in listed case, dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vibin Das (43 years years) Kollamparambil House, Ashokapuram P.O., Chunikara, Aluva, Aluva Taluk, Ernakulam, Pin - 683 101.

Defendants

Salim (53 years years) Pathuvana House, South Kalamassery. Thrikkakara North Village. Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. C.G. Joseph (77 years years) Choolamparambil, Cochin University P.O., Njalakam Kara, Kakkanad North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Rosy (73 years years) Choolamparambil, Cochin University P.O., Njalakam Kara, Kakkanad North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Rego (50 years years) Choolamparambil, Cochin University P.O., Njalakam Kara, Kakkanad North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam District. Farun Sathar P.S (24 years years) Pathuvana (H), Changampuzha Nagar P.O, Pin 682 033, Njalakam Kara, Thrikkara North Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff sought an adjournment without any tenable reason.
Evidence:
As plaintiff is not ready for evidence in listed case and as no steps are taken to adduce evidence in listed case, dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases