Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • About us
  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • Contact Us
EP 128/2017

Case between Vettan Saydali vs Vettan Beeran Kutty regarding unidentified property

Court
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Judge
Smt. Vincy TV
Order Date
2017-08-03
Duration
0 years, 2 months, 10 days
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

A case where the decree holder sought execution proceedings against the judgment debtor regarding an unidentified property, resulting in the case being dismissed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The Execution Proceedings were dismissed as the property could not be identified despite repeated opportunities given.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not Applicable
Case Type
Execution Proceedings
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Property could not be identified even after repeated chance were given. Hence there is no need to proceed with this EP. Hence EP dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vettan Saydali (1 years) Vettan House, Anathavoor amsom, Kaithakkara desom, Anathavoor Post.Pin-676301

Defendants

Vettan Beeran Kutty (0 years) Vettan House, Anathavoor amsom, Kaithakkara desom and post, 676301

Reliefs

Relief Type: Execution Proceedings
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Proceedings dismissed due to inability to identify the property
Evidence:

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
Case Filed
Fri, 06/02/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases