Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 484/2023

Case between Venugopal vs Sarasamma Gopalan et al regarding restraining from inducting strangers to plaint schedule property.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-10-09
Duration
approximately-2 years 15 days
Case Code No.
484
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Venugopal who filed a petition against Sarasamma Gopalan and others to restrain them from inducting strangers to the plaint schedule property. The petitioner claims that the property originally belonged to him and seeks to establish his title over it.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the petition cannot be entertained as there is already an injunction granted against the petitioner, allowing the counterclaim defendants to restrain him from making obstructions in the property.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the petition cannot be entertained as there is already an injunction granted against the petitioner, allowing the counterclaim defendants to restrain him from making obstructions in the property.
Key Reasoning:
The court noted that there was already an existing order of injunction against the petitioner.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court noted that there was already an existing order of injunction against the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

As there is already an order of injunction against petitioner herein, this petition cannot be entertained at this stage.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sarasamma Gopalan
Party Age
70
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Biji Bince
Party Age
45
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajay Bince
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Akash Bince
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Venugopal
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
B Ashok
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Reshmi K M
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Josekutty Mathew
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petitioner filed this petition to restrain the respondents from inducting strangers to the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
As there is already an order of injunction against petitioner herein, this petition cannot be entertained at this stage.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 10/24/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Wed, 10/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won