Case Summary
V.C Xavier Kutty is the plaintiff in this case against M/s. AVS Traders & Contractors and Paltahil Abdul Rasheed Aslam. The court heard the case and noted that the balance court fee was not paid, leading to the rejection of the plaint.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaint due to the balance court fee not being paid.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The plaintiff counsel reported no instruction. Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.C Xavier Kutty
- Party Age
- 73
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M/s. AVS Traders & Contractors
- Relation
- Rep. By its Managing Partner
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paltahil Abdul Rasheed Aslam
- Party Age
- 63
- Relation
- Managing Partner
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Manu Roy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Eliswa Saritha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Karol Mathews Sebastian Alencherry
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- C.J Lizy
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Balance Court Fee not paid, suit rejected.
Evidence:
Balance Court Fee not paid. Plaint rejected.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.C Xavier Kutty vs M/s. AVS Traders & Contractors et al regarding court fee balance
Case Code Year
Case between V.C Xavier Kutty vs M/s. AVS Traders & Contractors et al regarding court fee balance