Case Summary
The petitioner, Vazhamthodi Saidalavi, filed for partition to claim a share in the plaint B schedule properties. The court appointed an Advocate Commissioner, who inspected the property and submitted a report for the division of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Final decree for partition is passed.
Case Type
Interlocutory Application
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The Advocate Commissioner effectively divided the property in accordance with the preliminary decree.
The Advocate Commissioner effectively divided the property in accordance with the preliminary decree.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the petition is allowed and final decree for partition is passed as follows: i. The plaint B schedule properties shall be divided into two equal shares by metes and bounds.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Vazhamthodi Saidalavi (57 Years years)
Valavannur amsom, desom, PO.Adrusseri, Tirur Taluk.
Defendants
Ullattil Saidalavi (49 Years years)
Keraladeeswarapuram amsom desom, PO.K.Puram, Tirur Taluk.
Pathummakutty (66 Years years)
Moidutty (63 Years years)
Pathutty (56 Years years)
Pathummakutty (76 Years years)
Valavannur amsom, desom, Nerala, PO.Valavannur, Tirur Taluk.
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Possession
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Final decree for partition granted as per the properties mentioned.
Evidence:
The point is found in favour of the petitioners.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Commissioner Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Filed by the Advocate Commissioner after inspecting the property to assist in the division.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Document Type:
Commission Plans
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Filed by the Advocate Commissioner to show the proposed division of property.
Reference:
Ext.C2