Case Summary
This case involves a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction filed by the plaintiff, Vasudevan. V. K, against multiple defendants who are alleged to have trespassed and made unauthorized constructions on the plaint schedule property. The plaintiff claims to have undisputed possession and seeks to restrain the defendants from interfering with his property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and demolishing the sunshade portion.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, granting a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, restraining them from trespassing into the plaint schedule property and demolishing the building therein.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the plaintiff proved his undisputed possession of the plaint schedule property and that the defendants had no legal claim to it.
The court found that the plaintiff proved his undisputed possession of the plaint schedule property and that the defendants had no legal claim to it.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The defendants admitted that the plaintiff is paying tax with respect to the plaint schedule property and did not provide any serious challenge to the plaintiff's claim.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V. V. MUHAMMADALI
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- AKHILA MARYAT
- Party Age
- 30
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- C. K. NAZAR
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- K. T. K. CHANDRAN
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- SECRETARY
Plaintiffs Documents
Assignment Deed No. 2298/2008, Basic Tax Receipt issued by Village Office, Nadapuram to Vasu.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Vinodan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Babilal. T. T
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. R. Biju
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K. M. Ramdas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Court
- Advocate Name
- Jishine Babu. N
- Appearance Type
- Government Pleader
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiff seeks a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
Therefore, the plaintiff is entitled to get a relief of permanent prohibitory injunction from this court.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Assignment Deed
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves plaintiff's title to the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Basic Tax Receipt
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes that the plaintiff is paying tax for the plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Commission Report
Submitted By:
Court
Relevance:
Report filed by Advocate Commissioner regarding the inspection of plaint schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.C1
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU vs V. V. MUHAMMADALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between VASUDEVAN. V. K @ VASU vs V. V. MUHAMMADALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction