Case Summary
The plaintiffs include Vasu, Babu, Praveen, and Vijayan, who brought the suit against defendants Balan, Rajan, Maniyan, Manoj, and Madhavan. The court dismissed the case due to lack of evidence and instruction from the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiffs' lack of instruction and no evidence being presented.
Key Reasoning:
The court found the plaintiffs had no evidence to support their claims.
The court found the plaintiffs had no evidence to support their claims.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found the plaintiffs had no evidence to support their claims.
The court found the plaintiffs had no evidence to support their claims.
Supporting Evidence
No evidence adduced. Suit is dismissed.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed. Pronounced in the open court on this the 3rd day of February 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vasu
- Party Age
- 77
- Relation
- S/o Bharathy
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Babu
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o Vellukutty
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Praveen
- Party Age
- 32
- Relation
- S/o Mohanan
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vijayan
- Party Age
- 52
- Relation
- S/o. Thankappan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Balan
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o.Narayanan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- S/o Balan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maniyan
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o Achuthan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Manoj
- Party Age
- 38
- Relation
- S/o Maniyan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Madhavan
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- S/o Appu
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. A. G. Girishkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Meera Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Veena.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Abhijith.S.K
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Aravind.A.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Akshaya Babu.J.B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. K.G. Rajesh
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. S.Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Swayam Prabha.H.L
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to no evidence adduced by the plaintiff.
Evidence:
No evidence adduced. Suit is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022