Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 171/2023

Case between Vasanthi Suresh vs Rajesh et al regarding default dismissal

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Nanda Krishna M.
Order Date
2025-02-20
Duration
Case Closed
Thu, 02/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the plaintiff Vasanthi Suresh and defendants Rajesh and Subhadra. The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff did not appear for a hearing after multiple notices.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vasanthi Suresh
Party Age
55
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rajesh
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subhadra
Party Age
77
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jenoba P.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.K.Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B.Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Athira Sajeevan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Arpanai T.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Maria Ancy V.J
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Libin Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, Suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vasanthi Suresh vs Rajesh et al regarding default dismissal
Case Code Year
Case between Vasanthi Suresh vs Rajesh et al regarding default dismissal

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam District
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Thu, 02/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won