Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.P.(Succession) No. 9/2023

Case between Vasanthi Jain et al vs Nil regarding Succession Petition

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-06-27
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioners, including Vasanthi Jain, Nirmal Kumar Jain, Bharathi M. Jain, and Gautham Jain, filed a succession petition. However, the petition was dismissed as the petitioners were not present or ready for evidence despite multiple opportunities.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the succession petition due to the petitioners' failure to be present or ready for evidence after many chances.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Succession
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Petitioner not present or ready for evidence despite innumerable opportunities and postings as last chance no further time. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Vasanthi Jain (43 years) Souparnika Apartments, D-10, 10th Floor, T.D Road, Ernakulam-682 011 Nirmal Kumar Jain (42 years) Souparnika Apartments, D-10,10th Floor, T.D Road, Ernakulam-682 011 Bharathi M. Jain (41 years) No.670/1, M.P. Building, Sri S.J Temple road, Ward No.2, M.P Textiles matching center, Mandya, Karnataka-571 401 Gautham Jain (22 years) Souparnika Apartments, D-10, 10th Floor, T.D Road, Ernakulam- 682 011

Defendants

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases