Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 912/2025

Case between Varghese T.P. @ Pius Varghese vs Aswini Sachidanandan et al regarding suit rejection

Court
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-11-29
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Varghese T.P. @ Pius Varghese as the plaintiff and Aswini Sachidanandan and Shiva Prasath as defendants. The suit was rejected due to the failure to carry out an amendment as ordered regarding valuation.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court pronounced the judgment rejecting the suit due to non-compliance with a prior order on valuation amendments.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court pronounced the judgment rejecting the suit due to non-compliance with a prior order on valuation amendments.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit rejected. IA 1/25 closed, IA 2/25 closed, IA 8/25 closed. IA 7/25 closed vide separate Order.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varghese T.P. @ Pius Varghese
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Aswini Sachidanandan
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shiva Prasath
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Haridas P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mathew Devassi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rishikesh Haridas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Frijo K Sundaram
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bincy Jose
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Aravind Ajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.B Malini Rao
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Unnimaya M.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Nigil Shanly
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to failure to carry out amendment as ordered.
Evidence:
Hence suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Varghese T.P. @ Pius Varghese vs Aswini Sachidanandan et al regarding suit rejection
Case Code Year
Case between Varghese T.P. @ Pius Varghese vs Aswini Sachidanandan et al regarding suit rejection

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 11/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 11/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won