Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 716 / 2023

Case between Varghese T Tuat vs M/s Parthas Textiles et al regarding rejection of suit due to non-remittance of court fee.

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-08-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Varghese T Tuat filed a suit against M/s Parthas Textiles and its partners. The case was about the rejection of the suit due to non-payment of court fees.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the plaintiff's suit due to the non-remittance of the balance court fee.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's suit was rejected based on the lack of court fee payment.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's suit was rejected based on the lack of court fee payment.
Supporting Evidence
Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Judgment Evidence:

Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Varghese T Tuat
Party Age
83
Relation
S/o T V Thomas
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Parthas Textiles
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Praveenraj Rajendran
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o K L Rajendran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Laxmankumar Veeriah Mohanraj
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o Veeriah Mohanraj
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
John Joseph (Roy)
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Johnson Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sabir N S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Angel Gloria V S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sojo J Kallidukkil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Plaintiff's suit was rejected
Evidence:
No Balance court fee seen remitted so far. Plaint is rejected under Order 7 Rule 11 of Code of Civil Procedure.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Varghese T Tuat vs M/s Parthas Textiles et al regarding rejection of suit due to non-remittance of court fee.
Case Code Year
Case between Varghese T Tuat vs M/s Parthas Textiles et al regarding rejection of suit due to non-remittance of court fee.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 08/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won