Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
R.C.P. No. 23/2023

Case between Vanaja K.V. vs Ms. Shiny Augustine regarding rent control petition.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-12-04
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Vanaja K.V. filed a rent control petition against Ms. Shiny Augustine. The court allowed the petition based on the hearing held on December 4, 2024.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the previous review petition and allowed the rent control petition filed by Vanaja K.V.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the previous review petition and allowed the rent control petition filed by Vanaja K.V.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petition was allowed based on the dismissal of the review petition.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The court allowed the petition based on the previous order and the circumstances of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence RP 230/2024 dismissed. Thus order in rent control petition dated 09.08.2024 revived and rent control petition is allowed accordingly.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Vanaja K.V.
Party Age
50
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ms. Shiny Augustine
Plaintiffs Documents
Stamp on Rent Control Petition, Stamp on Vakalath, Stamp on petition, Stamp on Documents
Defendants Documents
Stamp on Vakalath, Stamp on petition

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prabhu Murali Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Yemuna P.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is allowed accordingly.
Evidence:
Thus order in rent control petition dated 09.08.2024 revived and rent control petition is allowed accordingly.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Vanaja K.V. vs Ms. Shiny Augustine regarding rent control petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Vanaja K.V. vs Ms. Shiny Augustine regarding rent control petition.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 12/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Tue, 12/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between V.K.Jayachandran vs Nisha M.V regarding petition under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control)Act, 1965
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Liya George vs Sulaiman regarding Petition under Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965
THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Dismissed
Case between Robin Thomas Vaidyan vs RAHA Ayurveda Hospital et al regarding eviction
Court of the Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Unknown
Case between Mrs. Susan Jacob John @ Susan John & Dr. Maria Kuriakose vs Mr. Annekot Ramadasan Padmakumar regarding Petition filed under Section 11(2)(b) of the Kerala (Buildings Lease & Rent Control) Act, 1965
The Third Additional Munsiff & Rent Controller, Ernakulam
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Munir Gul Mohammed Sait et al vs K.M. Abdulla et al regarding Rent Control Petition
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Rent Control Petition Unknown