Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 87/2022

Case between Valsamma Sainudheen vs Hasan P.M regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-08-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Valsamma Sainudheen and Sindhu Sainudheen are the plaintiffs, while Hasan P.M is the defendant. The case was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case as the first plaintiff was no longer available and the second plaintiff did not appear despite directions.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 07th day of August, 2024).

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Valsamma Sainudheen (65 years years) Sini Mansil, House No. 18/58/A, Perighatumukal Road, Vadakedu P.O, Kangarapadi 682 021 Sindhu Sainudheen (39 years years) Sini Mansil, House No. 18/58/A, Perighatumukal Road, Vadakedu P.O, Kangarapadi 682 021

Defendants

Hasan P.M (65 years years) Peringattil House, Ward No. 19, Kangarapadi, Wadakod P.O, 682 021

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiffs
Evidence:
Defendant represented. 1st plaintiff no more. 2nd plaintiff absent despite specific direction to appear. No representation for plaintiff. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases