Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Original Suit No. 266/2019

Case between Valsala Narayanan vs Kuttiyil Baburaj K.P. et al regarding partition

Court
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Shabeena M.
Order Date
2025-03-25
Duration
approximately-5 years 9 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Valsala Narayanan is the plaintiff seeking a partition of property inherited from their mother. The defendants include the legal heirs of Kuttiyil Baburaj K.P. who also claim shares in the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit for partition based on a joint statement from the parties involved, dividing the property into six equal shares.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree for partition of property
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit for partition based on a joint statement from the parties involved, dividing the property into six equal shares.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found that the property belonged jointly to the plaintiff and the defendants and awarded shares accordingly.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found that the property belonged jointly to the plaintiff and the defendants and awarded shares accordingly.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments indicate that the property jointly belonged to the plaintiff and defendants and their mother. Upon her death, her rights devolved upon them, entitling the plaintiff to a share in the property.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and the preliminary decree for partition is passed as follows: 1) That the plaint B schedule property shall be divided by metes and bounds into 6 equal shares and the plaintiff is entitled to one such share.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Valsala Narayanan
Party Age
61
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuttiyil Baburaj K.P.
Party Age
66
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuttiyil Radhakrishnan T.V.
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuttiyil Ramesh Babu K.P.
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jalajamani
Party Age
55
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasantha Baburaj K.P.
Party Age
60
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.C. Raveendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.S. Sajith Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.M. Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.N. Rekha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Malavika
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is decreed in terms of the joint statement for partition of the plaint B schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence the suit is decreed in terms of the joint statement executed by plaintiff, defendant No.3 & 4.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Document No.
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This document establishes the ownership of the plaint B schedule property which is jointly owned by the plaintiff and defendants.
Reference:
1709/1965

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Valsala Narayanan vs Kuttiyil Baburaj K.P. et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Valsala Narayanan vs Kuttiyil Baburaj K.P. et al regarding partition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 1 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Tue, 06/25/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Sat, 02/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-I
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF – I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF - I
Civil Suit Defendant Won