Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 636/2015

Case between Valsala B Menon vs Binu A.P et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and consequential reliefs.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-21
Duration
approximately-9 years 6 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Valsala B Menon, is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants to prevent them from encroaching on a motorable road essential for access to her property. The case involves issues regarding property ownership and usage rights.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a permanent prohibitory injunction restraining the defendants from constructing any compound wall or encroaching on the plaintiffs' road. The plaintiff was also awarded costs from the defendants.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants regarding the use of the Plaint B schedule road.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence of the plaintiff was unchallenged and supported by documentary evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: the defendants 1, 2, and 4 to 8, their men or agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from constructing compound wall or making any manner of construction or any other act encroaching to any portion of the plaint B schedule road or to reduce its width; or causing any interference or obstruction to the plaintiff's uninterrupted use of the plaint B schedule road including vehicular access for ingress and egress of plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Valsala B Menon (73 years) Arakkal House, NNRA -112, Elamkulam Village, LFC Road, Kaloor P.O, Pin – 682 018

Defendants

Mr. Binu A.P (45 years) Arakkal House, Little Flower Church Road, Elamkulam Village, Kaloor P.O, Pin – 682 017 Smt. Sarojini A.P (65 years) Arakkal House, Little Flower Church Road, Elamkulam Village, Kaloor P.O, Pin – 682 017 Corporation of Kochi (Age not specified years) Ernakulam Head P.O, Pin – 682 011 Smt. Baby (Age not specified years) Oniyath House, Eroor West P. O, Thrippunithura Shini (Age not specified years) Puthenpurakkal House, Kedamangalam, North Paravur, Ernakulam District

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendants are restrained from constructing a compound wall or interfering with the plaintiff's use of the B schedule road.
Evidence:
The defendants 1, 2, and 4 to 8, their men or agents are restrained by a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction from constructing compound wall or making any manner of construction or any other act encroaching to any portion of the plaint B schedule road or to reduce its width.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendants 1, 2, and 4 to 8.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the plaintiff's ownership and the agreed pathway from the partition deed.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed supports the claim regarding the extension of the pathway up to the public road.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Order issued by Kochi Municipal Corporation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides evidence of the municipality's acknowledgement of the pathway's status.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Stop Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memo is related to the prohibition of construction activities that may affect the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: FIR
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This FIR supports the plaintiff's claims regarding disturbances by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This judgment provides context regarding prior legal proceedings relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed further supports the ownership claims of the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Agreement of right of way
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement establishes the plaintiff's rights concerning the pathway.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deed aids in validating the claims about the pathway and usage.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Deposition
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This deposition is relevant to the legal context surrounding the case.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
This report is a court's assessment of the property and its usage.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Case Filed
Fri, 05/01/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases