Case Summary
The plaintiff, Vadamalai.S, was absent during the hearing. The defendant, R. Venkitachalam, was present, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent.
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent.
The defendant was present while the plaintiff was absent.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Judgment Evidence:
The suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Vadamalai.S
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- R. Venkitachalam @ Ramachandran Potty Venkitachalam
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S.Williams
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Manju. B
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Niju K. Raj
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Anayara Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sainu Shaji
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022