Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 66/2023

Case between V. Sasidharan Nair vs Hithesh Raj Purohit regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-05-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

V. Sasidharan Nair filed a suit against Hithesh Raj Purohit. The case was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case as not pressed during the hearing.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the case as not pressed during the hearing.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not press the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not press the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not press the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. Sasidharan Nair
Party Age
65
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hithesh Raj Purohit
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E.N Hari Menon
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Preetha Hari
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
A. Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M.N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sojo J Kallidukkil
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Syam Shankar Panickar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Johans Jacob
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Amal A.R
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The case was not pressed and was dismissed accordingly.
Evidence:
Not pressed. Endorsed. Dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V. Sasidharan Nair vs Hithesh Raj Purohit regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between V. Sasidharan Nair vs Hithesh Raj Purohit regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 05/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Fri, 05/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won