Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 254/2025

Case between V S Unnikrishnan vs Sanmarga Pradeepa Sabha et al regarding temporary injunction

Court
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

V S Unnikrishnan filed a petition seeking a temporary injunction against the Sanmarga Pradeepa Sabha and its officials to prevent them from conducting elections. The court found that a prima facie case was established that could cause irreparable injury to the petitioner if the injunction was not granted.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioner, preventing the Sanmarga Pradeepa Sabha from conducting elections as per their notice dated 02-03-2025, until further orders.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Temporary injunction against conducting elections until further orders
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction to the petitioner, preventing the Sanmarga Pradeepa Sabha from conducting elections as per their notice dated 02-03-2025, until further orders.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner established a prima facie case with potential for irreparable injury.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner established a prima facie case with potential for irreparable injury.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner have made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents 2 to 13 to conduct the GBM of 1st respondent Sabha as per the notice dated 02-03-2025 and to conduct the election therein until further orders.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V S Unnikrishnan
Party Age
53
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sanmarga Pradeepa Sabha
Relation
represented by Treasurer, Anoop C A
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ragesh V P
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prasad M V
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Tulsi P M
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sayuj V S
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
E S Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Temporary Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining respondents 2 to 13 from conducting the GBM of the first respondent Sabha as per the notice dated 02-03-2025 and to conduct the election therein until further orders.
Evidence:
an order of interim injunction is passed restraining respondents 2 to 13 to conduct the GBM of 1st respondent Sabha as per the notice dated 02-03-2025 and to conduct the election therein until further orders.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V S Unnikrishnan vs Sanmarga Pradeepa Sabha et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between V S Unnikrishnan vs Sanmarga Pradeepa Sabha et al regarding temporary injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won